Unbelievable part 3: Venice
‘The Venetians, like the British,
were a seagoing island race, who laid claim to an extensive empire
out of proportion to the size of their homeland, whose influence at
times extended to the reaches of the known globe. Yet like America,
Venice’s empire was more concerned with trade domination than with
actual territorial possession. And, like both empires, it was not
afraid of isolation: of turning its back on the large land mass that
began just across the water, or of ignoring the larger continental
worlds beyond – in the form of Europe, America and Asia.’
(Strathern pp. 1-2)
That
Venice’s vast maritime empire in the middle ages was built on trade
and all that the notion of trade can encompass made it the logical
home to Damien Hirst’s Treasures
from the Wreck of the Unbelievable,
an artist whose wealth and success have accumulated in his trade in
the art market. Hirst’s extravagance and the power he can wield in
a way make him the Venice of the art world. As a creator, a merchant,
a dealer, a buyer and an appropriator from humble beginnings, his
persona chimes with Venice’s past as a formidable city state that,
as historian Roger Crowley describes, was ‘conjured out of marsh,
existing perilously on oak pilings sunk in mud’ (p. 11). Crowley
also points out that for the Venetians who had no land to cultivate
and relied on imported goods for survival, ‘[t]rade was their
creation myth and their justification, for which they were reviled by
more terrestrial neighbours’ (p. 4). The Hirst brand is constructed
from myth (as will be examined when I
come to the Treasures Netflix
film) and his tactics in accumulating excessive wealth as an artist
and collector have attracted disdain.
In
the Baudrillardian sense, Venice and the Treasures
show
are Hirst’s Disneyland.* Crowley explains (p. 4):
‘The city’s prosperity rested on nothing tangible – no land holdings, no natural resources, no agricultural production or large population. […] Venice was perhaps the first virtual economy, whose vitality baffled outsiders. It harvested nothing but barren gold and lived in perpetual fear that if its trade routes were severed, the whole magnificent edifice might simply collapse.’
Today’s
commercial art world and Disney seem much less likely to meet a
demise with no sign of diminishing demand for their products. From
such descriptions it is easy to imagine Venice as a hyperreal
placeless place, a world between, as Crowley says, ‘the land
and the sea, the east and the west, yet belonging to neither’ (p.
4). Treasures embodied
that betweenness, mixing the past with the present, myth with
history, lies with truth, originals with appropriations, the
plausible with the implausible and the real with the fabricated. The
show also reflected the ‘peculiar mixture of the secular and
religious’ in the Venetian character (pp. 34-5).
Venice
seems always to have been a construction, beginning as a simulacrum
and remaining one today with its main trade of tourism cashing in on romantic notions of its past. However, at its core are its
people. In the early centuries of the common era, no land meant no
feudal system and so society was relatively democratic and
anyone
could thrive if they could trade. Survival in the physical conditions
was difficult, so people helped each other. For the common good they
had to work together, much as we’re seeing in circulated images of
the recent floods.
It has a history, though, of getting involved in violence, not
because it had a cause in the holy wars of the Crusades, but because
it profited from them and began to rule other ports from the lagoon
on conditions of tax-free trade. In the twelfth century, operating
from Palestinian ports substantially expanded trade routes for the
Italian republics, giving them access to goods, knowledge and skills
from as far as China as well as within the Levant. Crowley states
(pp. 35-6):
‘For Venetian merchants the crusades had proved highly profitable. In the process they deepened their knowledge of how to trade across a cultural divide, which would make them, in time, the interpreters of worlds.’
There
are further parallels to be drawn here with Hirst’s bartering in
the art market and close analysis of the work in Treasures;
can he and his team be considered as interpreters as well as creators
of (mythic) worlds? As we’ll see when I look in detail at specific
works, the show shared Venice’s affinity with the East and
demonstrated how intertwined the histories of the East and the West
have been since antiquity.
Concurring
with Crowley, historian Paul Strathern points out that the Venetian
empire looked east rather than west in contrast to other Italian
kingdoms and empires. In accounts of its history – apart from when
it was at war with certain territories – Venice appears to have had
relationships with other settlements akin to what is emerging in
discoveries of lost
ancient Greek ports in Egypt where fusions in Greco-Egyptian art
and evidence of shared communities have been uncovered. Also
according to Strathern, though, the fall of Constantinople in 1453
was blamed on ‘Venetian short-sightedness’ and saw ‘the split
between East and West, which had come into being more than a thousand
years previously when the Roman Empire had split in two, leading to
the establishment of the (Byzantine) Orthodox Church and the (Roman)
Catholic Church. Now this was to be replaced by the Moslem East and
the Christian West’ (p. 115). Even
so, Venice continued to amass wealth and art from the Byzantine and
Muslim worlds as well as farther afield. Closer by, Venice maintained
connections with Greece. Crete had been Venice’s largest colony in
1363 (Strathern
p.
45) and many of its wealthiest residents during and since the
medieval period owned vast collections of ancient and classical Greek
art and artefacts, perhaps
speaking
to Venice’s long-term resistance to Italian Rome and its attraction
east-wards.
Punta Della Dogana from across the Grand Canal |
In
terms of the materials used in the show, from where they came, who
worked with them and where they were displayed (Punta Della Dogana
was Venice’s customs house and Palazzo Grassi has held collections since the fourteenth century), Treasures
hearkened back to Venice’s glory days as a world power in trade.
The
sheer excessiveness of the Treasures
collection
mirrored the excess of Venice and its past. Reminiscent
of discoveries like the sunken Roman city of Baiae, an ancient
holiday resort near Naples and Pompeii, medieval Venice was often
viewed as an amoral haven where pleasure-seekers went to enjoy the
excesses of food, parties, jewellery, etc. (Strathern p. 118), while
evading close scrutiny by the church and conservative officials who
were more active in the surrounding Italian states. Today, it is a
tourist hotspot having to deal with the behaviour
of visitors, which is particularly challenging in tough times like
the current floods. Like Thonis-Heracleion,
Venice will sink,
with the process already happening at an alarming rate. The artefacts
found at the Thonis-Heracleion discovery site off the coast of
Alexandria, Egypt, and the activities around the digs are
inextricably related to the Treasures
exhibition,
which I will detail in later posts about sunken cities and the show’s
photography. These
further link to large-scale exhibitions of recovered artefacts
driving tourism to major cities such as Paris, London and Cairo. That
Treasures was
shown for seven months during a biennale year, it at once cashed in
on and propelled arts tourism to Venice in 2017, which raises a whole
gamut of ethical implications while indicating how intrinsic trade is to the show’s being.
The
histories I’ve read on Venice are, perhaps unsurprisingly, very
male in focus, and the issues I’ve presented here gloss over bigger
problems such as the historical persecution of Jews and the great many wars the
Venetian empire was involved in and upon which much of its commerce
was built and what led to its downfall. Today, these histories become
stories, and in the gaps in knowledge grow legends, out of which
develop myths to a point where it is difficult to untangle
established mythology from fictional mythology. In looking towards
the exhibition, at least it acknowledged women that were there in any
instance, including the new and remixed ancient mythologies it
presented. The works also showed the vulnerability of men, much as the
real ancient-world mythologies do. We’re only just beginning to
scratch the surface.
*Watching
and reading around The Florida
Project (dir.
Sean Baker, 2017) helps explain the Disneyland reference as it too rose from reclaimed land.
References
Baudrillard,
Jean, Simulacra and Simulation
(The Body in Theory: Histories of Cultural Materialism),
trans. by Sheila Faria Glaser (University of Michigan Press, 1994
[1981])
Crowley,
Roger, City of Fortune: How
Venice Won and Lost a Naval Empire
(London: Faber, 2011)
Strathern,
Paul, The Spirit of Venice: From
Marco Polo to Casanova
(London: Jonathan Cape, 2012)
Comments
Post a Comment