The life is in the eyes: viewing A Monster Calls (dir. J. A. Bayona, 2016)
Having earlier this year received counselling for mental
health issues, I found the many topics raised in A Monster Calls deeply affecting and cathartic. Like Conor O’Malley
(Lewis MacDougall), I was a child who lost a parent to illness and at around the same
time experienced extremes of either being bullied or being ignored at school. The other kids either didn’t know how to treat me, or thought I was an easy target. I was
placid, and big for my age. Aligning this with hardwired gender constructs,
they decided I was ‘manly’, stoic and strong, never once considering that I was
breaking inside and needed my pain to be treated as normal. It was easier to
shut me down and confuse me about my gender identity than to dare disrupt their
safe assumptions that parents lived to old age.
At 32 years old, I was still getting bullied, this time in a
bigger playground by people who could exert even more power over me. Like my
childhood experience, when I defied their expectations and stood up for myself,
I was the one who got in trouble. When I explained to my counsellor that I
didn’t want to be a victim, she introduced me to the concept of the drama
triangle, consisting of a perpetrator, their victim, and a hero. If the hero victimizes
the perpetrator on behalf of the victim, the identities shift around. This
useful video explains the triangle and how the identities can be more positively
re-framed:
In A Monster Calls, rather than be the hero Conor wishes
would fix all his problems by victimizing his bullies, the Monster (Liam
Neeson) enables him to make considered decisions for himself about the person
he will become based on how he responds to his circumstances. To do so, Conor
must become brave enough to be true to himself. While Conor is twelve years
old, this discovery is one many of us make throughout life, often repeatedly. In
presenting the monster as an enabler, the film offers a reminder, not unlike
the Universal ‘creature feature’ classics it channels so consciously, that
creatures we label as monsters are not necessarily monstrous. They can
represent the elephant in the room that we refuse to confront and offer a
starting point to resolve our problems.
Upon further reflection and enlightening conversation about A Monster Calls with my good friend and scholar of Hispanic studies Francesca SĂ¡nchez Ortiz, I rekindled my forgotten interest in Geraldine Chaplin. Chaplin’s performance
as Conor O’Malley’s head teacher acts as an intertextual reference to Bayona’s
other films while embodying a nostalgic familial connection with early cinema.
Indeed, her father’s films often explore approaches to dealing with the
complexities of life and survival. I was first drawn to her acting work when as
a teenager I saw her playing her grandmother, Hannah Chaplin, in Richard
Attenborough’s 1992 biopic of her father. I was completely absorbed while viewing A Monster Calls, and it was only while
watching the credits (under-appreciated goldmines of information) that I
remembered Chaplin was in it. It took a moment to recall who she played, then I
suddenly realized: ‘the life is in the eyes’ – those distinctive, inescapable
Chaplin eyes inherited from a man not unlike the easily misunderstood
characters in the yew tree creature’s moral fables.
When I watch Attenborough’s Chaplin, I take little interest in its bothersome leering camera
and reductive representations of the scandals and politics surrounding Charles
Chaplin. Instead, I could endlessly watch the film’s recreations of how,
looking back from the 1990s, films at the early end of the century were made.
Regardless of its cheesiness, I love the slapstick ‘Chaplin-esque’ sequence that
imaginatively retells Chaplin’s account of the covert editing of The Kid (dir. Charles Chaplin, 1921).
Like Chaplin’s silent comedies, it still makes me laugh while poignantly making
a point.
Geraldine Chaplin’s multilingualism and internationality
channel her father’s appreciation for the ability of non-‘talkie’ cinema to
transcend borders, cultures and language barriers. Her appearance in A
Monster Calls is more meaningful when put in the context of her previous
collaborations with Bayona. His debut, El
orfanato/The Orphanage (2007), is
the first of his loose triptych of films depicting children in difficult or
horrific circumstances which culminates with
A Monster Calls. If the latter evokes
films such as Victor Erice’s El espĂritu
de la colmena/The Spirit of the Beehive (1973), this is likely no accident.
In the films emerging in Spain during the early post-Franco years in the 1970s,
the child figure can often represent a new and uncertain Spain haunted by the
spectral presence of past violence. By channelling this and the ‘loose
trilogy’ approach to exploring such issues, films produced in/about Spain or
by Hispanic directors in the 2000s suggest that post-dictatorship issues are far from
resolved. (My pal Fiona Noble is much more of an authority on these ideas than
me as shown in one of her vintage blog posts.) This is reinforced by utilizing an actor such as Chaplin who starred in successful Spanish films from the earlier era, for example Ana y los lobos/Anna and the Wolves (dir. Carlos Saura, 1973).
The
three-point cycle seems doomed to repeat itself unless one (usually the last of
the chain – the enabler in place of the hero) steps out and breaks the chain. Given the current political climate, it is imperative that
each of us, as fully as we can, lives and faces our truth even if it
means admitting our faults and taking self-responsibility. If we deny what we
are, the monsters inside and out can only thrive. For many it is easier said
than done. Those of us privileged enough to be able to live our truths without
fear or oppression have a duty to become enablers for those whose rights and
experiences are denied. In the case of A
Monster Calls, it is a grieving child being encouraged to admit and work
through his anger at the loss of his mother to cancer lest he risk ruining his life through his negative actions. This message is
transferable to the pain felt by all of us about just about anything, even
nothing. Showing anger and emotion is human; it is our truth, and working
though it together with honesty and compassion instead of expecting a hero to
do it for us makes us function better as humans.
Comments
Post a Comment